Burling lays out vision for new train in NH

Shira Schoenberg reports in the Concord Monitor on efforts by Rail Transportation Authority Chairman Peter Burling to bring a new commuter train to New Hampshire, using hundreds of millions in federal money.

Burling is convinced that it is possible, but it will not be easy. He faces several major obstacles: a clash with Pan Am, the railway company that owns the tracks; opposition from some backers of the state's bus system; and $8 billion in a pot of federal funding that has $101 billion in requests this year.

And Burling must convince the public that rail is a realistic goal. "New Hampshire is 25 years missing in action when it comes to rail transit," Burling said in a meeting with the Monitor's editorial board this week.

Trains are something we all agree on. We all think other people should ride them more so that our lane on the highway will be less crowded. Even the most "successful" commuter trains are massively subsidized, far more than other modes of transportation. A few inter-city links on the East Coast turn a slight profit, not counting the deferred maintainence costs that Amtrak can't afford. Long-distance lines are notoriously wasteful.

I remember during a Senate debate on Amtrak funding, Senator Sununu asked me to research the cost of a cross-country ticket on several Amtrak lines, and the cost of a one-way airline ticket. In each case, Amtrak charged far more than the airline, but still lost money on the seat. In fact, it would have been cheaper for Amtrak to buy each customer the airline ticket than to accept their fare.

Burling is seeking $154 million of federal stimulus money to get the train started, but that's just a fraction of the overall start-up costs that were budgeted at $300 million in the Department of Transportation's Wish List earlier this year. This would not include the annual operating subsidy borne by New Hampshire taxpayers.

Meanwhile, Pan Am Rail hasn't agreed to give up the right of way for the tracks the state wants to use. Burling is now threatening to use eminent domain to seize the tracks to further this railroad boondoogle.

Smith brings Burling into Leishman Lease Deal

Kevin Landrigran reports in the Nashua Telegraph that Finance Chair Marjorie Smith claims that veteran State House insider Peter Burling got her involved in efforts to renew a lease deal for State Representative Peter Leishman:

Smith said it was former state Sen. Peter Burling, of Cornish, who first raised to her concerns that Leishman's pursuit of the lease was jeopardizing the future of bringing back passenger rail service to the state.

Pan Am owns the track from the New Hampshire border to Concord that would provide the rail link for commuters traveling to Boston.

Burling is chairman of the New Hampshire Rail Authority that last month applied to the Obama administration to get competitive stimulus money for the rail effort.

Last month, Fink informed Campbell that due to the state's failure to properly bid the work, he was suspending negotiations with DOT officials about the passenger rail project.

"When Peter Burling mentioned Peter Leishman's name and said that the contract with Peter Leishman was interfering with progress on the passenger rail proposals, I replied I thought that the two could be kept separate,'' Smith wrote. (more)

Smith denies putting any pressure on Campbell to renew the lease, and her letter to Campbell indicates that Campbell didn't know that Leishman had a lease renewal pending before being speaking with Smith. No one involved in the case has yet to explain why so many public officials were taking such an active interest in a lease agreement that nets the State less than $10,000 annually.